Contact

Correcting a fact

Name the page, quote the sentence, and link the thing that supersedes it. A vendor page, a dated release, a regulator filing or a partner directory entry all count. What follows is a fix and a new verification date on the page.

The corrections that matter most here are the ones about scope: a capability that exists for CRE but not C&I, a memo that is generated but not editable, a rating model that is configurable only by the vendor. Those distinctions are the whole point of the pages and the easiest to get slightly wrong.

If you are the vendor

Any fact about your own product can be corrected. Rankings cannot be bought, previewed or approved, and no vendor sees a page before it publishes. Positions are our editorial read against the criteria printed on every ranked page.

Several platforms here would move on evidence that costs nothing to publish.

• A named institution underwriting C&I files on the product, with asset size
• Whether the credit memo is generated, templated or handed back to the analyst
• Who can change the risk rating model, and whether overrides are captured
• Whether covenants and policy exceptions are tracked past close
• Whether underwriting can be licensed without the origination suite, and at what price

Suggesting a platform we do not cover

Send the name and one link showing the product is sold to US banks or credit unions and is underwriting commercial files somewhere today. Inclusion needs three things: it does something a credit officer would recognise as underwriting, it is purchasable now, and its existence in production is confirmable outside the vendor's own deck.

What we cannot help with

We do not run selections, broker introductions, negotiate contracts or advise on a particular institution's decision. We hold no pricing beyond what vendors publish, and we do not estimate. Nothing here is legal, regulatory or accounting advice.